Every big bull run seems to lead to a property bubble, as confident investors and companies drive up prices by parking at least a part of their profits in real estate. In 1994-95, at the height of the primary market mania, listed companies raised vast quantities of money through Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) and rights issues. A large chunk of money raised was invested in property, creating a huge bubble, which burst just after the primary market in equities went dead.
Interestingly, the property market has remained subdued for exactly as long as the primary market remained dormant. Despite hefty and well-warranted sops on home loans and a low interest rate regime, the realty market took a decade to recover from the post-1995 slump. Suddenly now, property prices have zoom-ed, despite home loan rates having risen and increase in supply of good housing stock and land (in Mumbai, with the constant revision in floor space index and development of vast textile mill lands) and generous funding of builders and developers by banks and housing finance firms.
Leading builders would correctly argue that it is probably a more important barometer of economic health than the Sen-sex. After all, there is a worldwide bubble in real estate in all major cities of the world. In most of these markets, the boom is due to low interest rates and massive funding available to borrowers. Often, property investment is an alternative to the capital market.
But in
Many believe the price of the DLF purchase will work only if property rates remain at the present high, or rise further. But the notion that property rates will not be impacted by a significant increase is supply is itself curious. Moreover, the sale of mill lands is the subject of litigation which could not be quashed, despite a concerted plea to the Supreme Court by the mill owner lobby. The Mumbai high court, which is hearing the case, has not stayed any construction on the land, but made it clear that it will be at the builders’ risk.
• Property prices have suddenly zoomed and the reasons seem unsustainable
• Banks and financing institutions may be getting dangerously extended
Property consultant Sunil Bajaj says these aggressive bids are only possible as the entire business is bankrolled several times over by housing finance companies and aggressive private banks. For instance, banks and housing finance institutions are fuelling and funding large bids by becoming partners in the real estate deals. The
Is there an element of multiple funding or creative financing in these transactions? Are banks and institutions extending themselves dangerously here? Only the Reserve Bank of
http://fecolumnists.expressindia.com/full_column.php?content_id=94867