FICCI has chosen to defend a strange issue
Sucheta Dalal
The Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) strongly demanded the immediate release of seven directors  of AMRI Hospital in Kolkata arrested after a devastating fire consumed  93 lives. While FICCI called the arrests ‘anti-industry’ and  ‘non-discriminatory’, chief minister Mamata Banerjee hit back hard  saying she did not want industry that kills people. Indian industry associations are lobbying outfits that rarely take a strong and specific stand  on any issue. FICCI was probably emboldened because its former director  general, Dr Amit Mitra is now West Bengal’s finance minister; no other  association joined the plea. Now that FICCI has been slapped down, will  these lobby groups go into a shell again?
Interestingly, in the many decades of their existence, industry groups  have never pushed for clarity of rules and processes with the  government. Heads of industry, who met the prime minister and finance  minister recently, bleated about harassment by powerful investigation  and enforcement agencies which are empowered to threaten and intimidate  companies or drag them through financially debilitating litigation based  on their own capricious interpretation of the rules or British-era  regulations that were framed to keep Indians in check. 
They also have no qualms about initiating vindictive action at the behest of politicians. Yet, neither the industry associations  nor the dozen-odd industrialists in Parliament have ever made a serious  demand for a drastic cut in red tape or clarity in framing of statutes,  rules, circulars and notifications of government. Given this  background, FICCI’s plea to the firebrand Mamata Banerjee is rather  surprising. Worse, some homework would have shown that there is unlikely  to be much sympathy from the courts. In the Uphaar Cinema fire tragedy  several years ago, the Delhi High Court had lifted the corporate veil to  accept the prosecution’s contention that the Ansals were, in fact,  controlling and running the cinema house that was burnt down and could  not be absolved of violation of rules and lack of maintenance which led  to the fire that killed so many people.