Consumer Protection Authority Sends Notices to Ola, Uber for Unfair Trade Practices
The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) on Friday issued notices to Ola and Uber for unfair trade practices and violation of consumer rights, slamming the ride-hailing platforms over lack of proper consumer grievance redressal mechanism, deficiency in service, unreasonable levy of cancellation charges and fairness of algorithm used to charge fares.
 
As per the data from the national consumer helpline (NCH), 2,482 grievances were registered by consumers against Ola and 770 grievances were registered against Uber in the month of April, the ministry of consumer affairs said in a statement.
 
Last week, the CCPA, under its chief commissioner Nidhi Khare, warned ride-hailing platforms like Uber and Ola to fix rising consumer complaints regarding ride cancellations, cancellation charges, random surge pricing, and long waiting times, or else face penal action.
 
The department of consumer affairs, in a meeting with ride-hailing companies Ola, Uber, Rapido, Meru Cabs and Jugnoo, directed them to become convergence partner in the NCH, to enable better grievance redressal for consumers and also compliance with Consumer Protection Act, 2019 and E-commerce Rules.
 
The notice mentioned unreasonable levy of cancellation charge wherein users are not shown the amount of time within which cancelling a ride is permitted.
 
"The amount of cancellation charge is not displayed prominently on the platform before booking the ride. Undue cancellation charges are borne by users when they are forced to cancel the ride due to unwillingness of the driver to accept the ride or come at the pick-up location," said the watchdog.
 
The primary issues raised in the notice are deficiency in service which includes lack of proper response from customer support, driver refusing to take payment by online mode and insisting for cash only, higher amount charged, despite going on the same route previously at a lesser charge, unprofessional driver behaviour and driver refusing to switch on AC when the consumer is promised AC ride on the app.
 
The CCPA also raised inadequate consumer grievance redressal mechanism in absence of both customer care number and details of grievance officer as required to be mentioned on the ride-hailing platforms.
 
There is also a lack of any information on the algorithm or method used by the company to charge different fares for the same route from two individuals."
 
"It may be mentioned that a significant number of complaints have been lodged by consumers across the country on multiple issues which affect their rides booked through both the ride hailing platforms," the ministry said.
 
On Thursday, Uber India's director of central operations Nitish Bhushan said that the company is "reinforcing service quality expectations with drivers especially in areas like cancellations and ensuring AC rides."
 
"In addition to driver notifications and training, repeated complaints from riders on these service quality essentials could lead to penalties and even restricted app access," Mr Bhushan added.
 
He, however, did not elaborate on if any penal action was initiated against the errant drivers, as 770 grievances were registered against Uber in the month of April via the NCH, like paid amount not refunded, unauthorised charges, charging more than MRP, among others.
 
The department of consumer affairs is set to issue new guidelines related to surge pricing and ride cancellations by ride-hailing platforms soon that will give some reprieve to the end-users.
 
CCPA's head Ms Khare had given the ride-hailing platforms 30 days to fix their algorithms related to ride cancellations and surge pricing, else they will be penalised.
 
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
Comments
Enforcement Directorate Digs up Assets of Karvy Stock Broking that SEBI Failed To Discover since 2019
Sucheta Dalal, 21 May 2022
On 8 March 2022, the enforcement directorate (ED) at Hyderabad issued a provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) against C Parthasarathy, founder of the Karvy group of entities, his sons...
98 BSE Brokers and 82 NSE Brokers Surrender Membership in Past 2 Years as Smaller Brokers Struggle with Increased Compliance Rules
Yogesh Sapkale, 21 May 2022
The past two years after global lock-downs were triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic, India's investor population has almost doubled due to the rush of new investors. Strangely, however, the brokerage business is seeing a huge churn...
Fortis Funds Diversion Case: SEBI Imposes Penalties of Rs38.75 Crore on 32 Entities
Moneylife Digital Team 20 May 2022
Markets regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has imposed penalties totalling Rs38.75 crore on 32 entities, including Fortis Healthcare Holdings, in a case related to diversion of funds of Fortis Healthcare Ltd...
IRDAI Directs Motor Insurers To Stop Ads Displaying Services
Moneylife Digital Team 20 May 2022
The insurance regulator  Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) has asked motor insurance providers to discontinue advertisements showing services, like free pick-up and drop of vehicle, which are not part...
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback