SC Upholds Gujarat HC Verdict on Cooperative Societies as a State Subject
The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a 2013 Gujarat High Court judgement, which struck down certain provisions of the 97th constitutional amendment while holding that Parliament cannot enact laws with regard to cooperative societies as it is a state subject.
 
A three-judge bench of justices RF Nariman, KM Joseph and BR Gavai delivered the judgement dismissing Centre's appeal against the high court order.
 
Justices Nariman and Gavai struck down only Part IXB of the amendment, while Justice Joseph wrote a dissenting judgement striking down the entire constitutional amendment.
 
Justice Nariman said: "I have struck down Part IXB as far as cooperative societies are concerned. Justice Joseph has given a dissenting judgment where the entire constitution amendment has been struck down."
 
The 97th constitutional amendment, dealt with issues related to effective management of the cooperative societies, which was passed by Parliament in December 2011 and came into effect from 15 February 2012.
 
The Centre had argued that the provision did not denude the state governments of its power to enact laws with regard to cooperatives. During the hearing, the apex court had examined a question whether the provision denuded states of their exclusive power to enact laws to deal with management of cooperative societies. By virtue of the Act, Article 19(1)(c) of the Constitution was amended to give protection to the cooperatives and Article 43B (Promotion of cooperative societies) and Part IXB were inserted.
 
The High Court verdict came on a PIL (public interest legislation) challenging the legality of the 97th constitutional amendment on the ground that Centre had no legislative competence to enact law for cooperative societies.
 
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
Comments
saharaaj
2 days ago
Judgement of Guj high court carries weight it di d not have to deal with situation like PMC bank cross country bank for the private gains of its office bearers
FAQs on Pegasus in India context
IANS 20 July 2021
Q. How did the Pegasus revelations happen?
A. Forbidden Stories, a website and Amnesty International had access to a leak of 50,000 phone numbers of NSO clients selected for surveillance. NSO makes the Pegasus...
Consumers Reeling under Increasing Fuel Prices while Govt, Oil Marketing Companies Earning Higher Revenues
Moneylife Digital Team 19 July 2021
While consumers are reeling under the ever-increasing prices of petrol, diesel and domestic liquified petroleum gas (LPG) cylinders, the Union government and State-run oil marketing companies (OMCs) are earning higher revenues and...
Pegasus Snoop List Includes Two Union Ministers, Three Opposition Figures, Several Businessmen
IANS 19 July 2021
The Indians in the snooping database include over 40 journalists, three major Opposition figures, one constitutional authority, two serving ministers in the Narendra Modi government, current and former heads and officials of...
Sharad Pawar Meets PM Modi to Discuss Issues in Co-operative Banking Amidst New Amendments
Moneylife Digital Team 17 July 2021
Two days ahead of monsoon session, Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) chief Sharad Pawar met Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday. The meeting lasted for about 50 minutes. In a series of tweets after the meeting, Mr Pawar says, he...
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback