What We Need Is Thanedar, Not Chowkidar, for Curbing Corruption
Investors who lost heavily in Dewan Housing Finance Ltd (DHFL) had thought that Kapil and Dheeraj Wadhawan, promoters of the failed finance company DHFL, were being held in Taloja jail. For the past 15 months, it transpires that they have been cosily ensconced in the Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital under the pretext of a minor ailment like sleep disorder.
 
The Wadhawans were jailed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA, for running a criminal operation of creating thousands of fake accounts and fake loans (the infamous Bandra Books) and causing a loss of Rs40,000 crore. But they could easily game the system and be in a hospital.
 
This isn't the first time they have done so. Two years ago, in April 2020, during the strict lock-down ordered due to the coronavirus pandemic, 23 members of the Wadhawan family were permitted to defy restrictions and drive from Mumbai to Mahabaleshwar in order to 'chill'. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had said they were 'absconding' at that time. How did they drive through sealed areas across Maharashtra? 
 
The principal secretary (special), home department, Amitabh Gupta, had issued a letter on his letterhead allowing them to. When the news came out, Anil Deshmukh, the then home minister in Maharashtra ordered an inquiry and promised stringent action against Mr Gupta, who claimed to have acted on 'humanitarian grounds'. What was the 'strict' action? He was let off in the inquiry and promoted as Pune police chief five months later! Perhaps, a reward is also due to everyone handling the Wadhawan case for allowing them to remain in the hospital for 15 months (nine in a private hospital).
 
In another case, Ravi Parthasarathy, the former chairman of an even bigger scam, Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services (IL&FS), remains free. IL&FS had imploded with a debt of almost Rs100,000 crore. He was arrested but only because the Tamil Nadu police acted on a complaint by a private entity. However, he got bail, unlike some of the members of his cabal of executives who helped Mr Parthasarathy control IL&FS for over 25 years.
 
His colleagues are in jail for years now. Mr Parthasarathy is free presumably because scores of officers of the Indian Administrative Services (IAS), who have benefited from their association with IL&FS, are returning the favour.
 
A few weeks ago, CBI arrested a former managing director (MD) of the National Stock Exchange (NSE) and her close friend, the former group operating officer Anand Subramanian. If CBI is seriously interested in probing the algo scam at NSE, the true beneficiaries and those who facilitated the scam and derailed a proper investigation have to be made accountable.
 
Like in DFHL and IL&FS, will the big fish of NSE scam also be treated with kid gloves?
 
The fourth example of continued inefficiency and corruption is in public sector banks (PSBs). Data available from the bankruptcy resolution process show how badly PSBs are run. Nearly one-third of the cases admitted for resolution have gone into liquidation, with a recovery rate of merely 5%.
 
Excluding the top-15 cases (by resolution value), the recovery rate is just 18%. Over 90% of the write-off is by PSBs. This points to an issue that no one wants to act against—corruption in PSBs, which is cutely referred to as 'poor due diligence.' 
 
An average person cannot borrow even one rupee from a bank without first securing the bank's interests. How could thousands of companies manage it? At the time of lending, bankers don't know whether a business will succeed or fail; or whether the borrower is honest or crooked. So, they demand adequate collateral and a personal guarantee (PG) to secure their loan. When the interest and principal repayments are delayed, they can follow due process, liquidate the collateral, and demand that borrowers make good the money personally (as the PG requires them to). This is routinely done with small borrowers. So how is the recovery of so many cases as low as 5% and just 1%-2% in some infamous cases? The single biggest reason for bad loans is obvious: corrupt banker-businessmen nexus, sometimes with politicians pulling strings. But hardly any banker has been put behind bars.
 
Thanedar, Not Chowkidar
 
In 2014, before the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government came to power, in speech after election speech, Narendra Modi colourfully painted the previous regime as corrupt. The prime minister (PM) promised to act as a chowkidar to reduce corruption, and bring in 'good governance'. Is the slogan working? 
 
Not quite. It is perhaps because he focused on the wrong metaphor. 
 
Prevention of corruption (being a chowkidar) is possible only by instituting a merit-based system that rewards efficiency and honesty. This is an extremely difficult and long-drawn process. 
 
I am not sure if PM Modi can ever act as a chowkidar, even if he wants to. But he can surely act as a thanedar, by ensuring fast resolution of corruption cases once they come to light. Exemplary action is easier and will burnish his anti-corruption image. 
 
Scams, misconduct and misdemeanours happen regularly because the price of getting caught is insignificant. Yet, we do not focus on measures such as penalties, fines, disgorgement, exemplary damages and personal accountability. 
 
Surprisingly, it is the same across the world, even though 'crime doesn't pay' and 'make them pay for it' are common expressions. 
 
As philosopher Nassim Taleb says, while economic literature focuses on incentives as encouragement (carrots), it does not focus enough on disincentives or penalties (sticks) that should eliminate from the system incompetent and nefarious actors who inflict harm. 
 
This disincentive is fashionably called 'skin in the game' now. You can have as many chowkidars as you want. But only if you have thanedars (not the Taloja jail variety, though), who can make an example of scamsters and their accomplices, will there be real deterrence. 
 
Will PM Modi move towards a system of making them pay? That will tell us whether he is serious about addressing the corruption issue.
 
This article first appeared in Business Standard on Monday, 28 March 2022
 
Comments
saharaaj
4 months ago
Thanedars and Chowkidaars both are corrupt what to do ? Thanedaar collects HAFTA from Chokidaar
r_ashok41
4 months ago
First of all our financial system needs to be completely overhauled to ensure there is no loopholes for people to utilise it and for siphoning off the money there should be strict punishment with financial implications so that i will not give some other people to also try to cheat the public.Also priority should be given for retail investors to first get the money and then other bigger fries.
Money siphoned off should be recovered quickly and if necessary their fixed assets also should be seized and disposed off.
saharaaj
4 months ago
some had entire mega farm houses as prison with retinue of servants
saharaaj
4 months ago
In Imperial democracy some are more equal than others . some prisoners had 5/6 rooms of the ward to themselves like sitting room bathroom dining room computer room etc
pmbhate
4 months ago
Nothing will be accomplished by goody-goody thanedars or chowkidars. We need tough no-nonsense individuals a la K P S Gill or T N Seshan. Controversial, yes. But so was Bhim’s ‘gadaprahar’ on Duryodhan’s thighs, the only part of the body that was not protected. There was no other option at that time, there is no other option now. A severe thrash in public on the cheek of even one financial terrorist (we all know what happened on the Oscars night) during his/her arrest will give a strong message to other terrorists and their handlers.
jaishirali
4 months ago
The country's thanedars or chowkidars are financed by the same thieves, so as far as action is concerned, your guess is as good as mine. Unless we disband the so called 'steel frame' of the IAS and its fellow services and change them all to contractual assignments, the same cosy club will continue to save its members and its benefactors.
anant.9196
4 months ago
Completely agree on the sad state of 'punishments'. But it looks as if only PM Modi has to act! What about the so called other 'Institutions' of Democracy? What are the Courts and myriad other watch dogs doing? Other than a Moneylife what are the other ' fearless Media ' doing? Do none of them have any role?
kpushkar
4 months ago
Great , ro the point .. dont know if any Thanedar would wake up here
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback